Share this post

Originally posted in the spooky2 forum.  Shared here, for those who may benefit.

Hello People. I have titled this thread as such so that it will show up for others in the future.

My spooky central final part was delivered last Monday 18th January 2016, and I set about using it straight away. So, here’s what I have been doing.

Firstly, I downloaded the “preset” from David Bourke (Thanks David), for “Cancer Viruses Plasma” attached below, and ran them. Taking a mental note of what “seemed” to be working. When I say, seemed to be working, let me explain a little further.

Cancer Viruses Plasma.txt
(3.16 KiB) Downloaded 79 times

My tumour is close to my anus, and as we all know, cancer loves sugar (obligate glucose metaboliser) as per Otto Warburg. Now when I feed it with a pint of beer, or a bag of chips or whatever carbs, I can feel a “pain” in the area. Suffice to say, I try not to feed it as best that I can.

So, because I can feel it when it’s being fed, that gives me the opportunity to “feel it” if it’s being “killed” So, in the presets are as follows.

CODE: SELECT ALL

1607450,1604000,1529520,1604368,1604850.01

Dwell times 300 per frequency.
I was hoping that I could give a definitive answer to the collective about 1607450 and 1604000 to say which was best, and if I was to put a wager on it, then it would be 1604000, however, I did feel a pain in the area with all the frequencies when running the plasma. BTW, I was laid on the bed, with the tube as close as I could get it to the tumour. Ultra sonic was held just above johnny thomas at the front, and the tens pads were right hand, left foot.

I ran this for an hour straight. (one after the other)

I then decided to do a bio feedback scan, and kill what I found. The bio scan was in simple contact mode (no plasma)

This was the scan settings, thanks again David, for your help early in my journey.

image_bio_scan.jpg

However, I unticked the single scan box to do a full and accurate scan. Which took over 90 minutes.

I do have a problem with this method though, some “fly in the ointment” so to speak. I suffer with rosacea, a skin complaint that started this whole journey, and when I run the bio feedback scan this shouts louder than the cancer at times. I can feel a tingling in my face where the rosacea spots lie as I run the bio scan, and yes, I want to eradicate the rosacea from my face, it isn’t life threatening.

So, I get the results which are as follows…

CODE: SELECT ALL

1618045,1655702.5,1637492.5,1619916.25,1657247.5,1684570,1618101.25,1655567.5,1678465

I then run JW spooky central preset, with the plasma, ultrasound, and contact as above for an hour straight.

I then ran the cancer viruses plasma again for good measure.

Now, although I did feel some “numbness” in the area of the tumour when I was running all of the above, I did try to make a mental note of which frequencies were giving me the “most numb” feeling. 1604000 does feel good.

So… I ran all of the above for 4 days straight (it took up my week) I am a little disappointed I haven’t had any herx reaction whatsoever. Yes I did get tired when running the plasma tube, and fell asleep at times, a herx would make me think I’ve been hitting the MOR’s. At the moment, I don’t think I have.

So, my next plan, will start it tomorrow, and I was thinking about doing a bio scan from 1603000 to 1605000 then killing it for an hour, any input would be greatly appreciated.

41 thoughts on “My Rife Cancer Journey

  • 10th October 2018 at 10:46 am
    Permalink

    A tumor may swell before it starts to shrink and this might explain the pain you had with certain frequencies that you tried initially. The swelling of the tumor may press onto a nerve ending. If a frequency does not work on a condition then it should not cause pain.

  • 10th October 2018 at 10:46 am
    Permalink

    Vincent, thanks for the post. I am also new with SC and not nearly as sophisticated or adventuresome as you. I have been wondering about running a bx-by range sweep with the plasma. John shows sweeps on the recent SC video but I am not sure if the settings he uses were just to show the behavior of the plasma or if those would actually be the right program options for a plasma sweep treatment? I am hoping someone might help me with that.

    Mark

  • 10th October 2018 at 10:47 am
    Permalink

    Mark, Dr Loyd had a BXBY sweep that he runs with + 1 hz on Out 2 until you get another opinion! He also uses 11th Harmonic also which you could try!

    sweep 11429800 11430200 1 #BY -/+ 200 Hz
    sweep 11779700 11780300 1 #BX -/+ 300 Hz.

    original carcinoma virus frequency was 11,780,000 Hz. A sweep 300 above and below that has been working great for us for many years.

    Dr. Hulda Clark discovered that cancer related pain is generally caused by Strep pneumonia infection.
    We have found that to be true and people go off their pain meds after treating for that.

  • 10th October 2018 at 10:49 am
    Permalink

    Fidel Balinghassay Said…

    Dr holt used insulin blocker during treatment….. I suggest intake of Psyllium 5 minutes before treatment and see where it goes…..
    Red light therapy also induce heat as diathermy ..Dr Holt is using heat in the form of x rays …. good luck 🙂

  • 10th October 2018 at 10:49 am
    Permalink

    My next message

    Interesting update. As mentioned in the first post, I said I would do a biofeedback scan between 1603000 and 1605000 and I got ONE result.

    CODE: SELECT ALL

    1604974
    so have been killing it for the past hour.

    I then did another scan, and again, got ONE result.
    CODE: SELECT ALL

    1604973.66
    Guess what’s going to get run first thing tomorrow?

  • 10th October 2018 at 11:34 am
    Permalink

    Hi Vincent,
    if you scan across 1604,000 1609,000 do you get any results in this range now? Seems like you get a clean slate now?

    thanks
    Jason

  • 10th October 2018 at 12:00 pm
    Permalink

    Done Just that… and got…
    CODE: SELECT ALL

    1605177.5,1607637.5

    Ran those for 15 minutes each, and did a rescan and got…
    CODE: SELECT ALL

    1605657.5,1608117.5,1606418.75

  • 10th October 2018 at 12:07 pm
    Permalink

    Just run a full 1/2 hr scan from 1603000 – 1609000 and got the following

    CODE: SELECT ALL

    1606525,1606626.25,1607935

  • 10th October 2018 at 12:07 pm
    Permalink

    Hi Vincent,
    I’d graph all of these and see what patterns, if any, are being formed.
    This 1604K-1607.5K is the range for BX as given by Rife.
    Stay with it. How are you feeling?

    Other thought; once you are done with this:
    Reading some of the testimonies of the Dr’s who used the Rife machines – they quite often say ” I just tried all the frequencies”.
    So once you are done with BX, it may also be good to go through his other frequencies for other conditions – that will then match what the Dr’s were doing…
    except in your case; you will be a lot more accurate because they were just spinning the dial around to various places and in some cases it seems with not much understanding.
    As before I would sweep similarly to what you are doing for BX; and consider the range of 1935 & 1936 numbers & some buffer above & below.

    http://rifevideos.com/dr_rifes_true_ori … ncies.html — scroll down to the 1936 & 1935 tables.

    Unfortunately, or fortunately, we are at the mercy of Hoyland’s measurements. Rife definitely thought he was doing something & seeing it with his microscope; and others confirmed it with the lab experiments & test-tubes; but where it comes to frequencies & the various machines after Ray #3 (my opinion) it seems like he was one-step removed from things. This could be a source of errors.

    I also saw mention that Hoyland, used higher harmonics than Rife’s true frequencies in his Ray#5. I’d suggest to stay around these original numbers Hoyland took of Rife’s work…

  • 10th October 2018 at 12:08 pm
    Permalink

    The rosacea is getting on my nerves. I’m sure that every time I do a sweep in that range, my face lights up. I’m almost sat on the tube for some of the frequencies but it’s not where I’m getting the reaction. Maybe I’ve blasted it (the cancer) with my original “Gledhill” frequency of 1604974

  • 10th October 2018 at 12:08 pm
    Permalink

    When I ran the 1604974 frequency, I had a different reaction to anything else I have run. It was like a “specific” pins and needles in the “very area” of the tumor.

    Now I’ve not run anything over the weekend, and have needed the toilet “a lot” over the weekend. Hopefully, that’s an indication of “getting the bad stuff out” of my system.

    It will be back to the “scan and kill” tomorrow.

  • 10th October 2018 at 12:09 pm
    Permalink

    Scan and kill sessions today….

    First scan between results… don’t know why I chose this range… going mad…
    CODE: SELECT ALL

    1630470,1630905

    Killed for 600

    Next scan results..
    CODE: SELECT ALL

    1644235,1643650

    Killed for 600

    I then ran the JW presets for Cancer that have come with the February version of the software. Both versions.

    Then back to scanning… Next scan results
    CODE: SELECT ALL

    1646615,1632370

    Killed for 300

    Finally one more scan… this time between 1550000 and 1700000 and got the following
    CODE: SELECT ALL

    1607716.25,1673000

    I was completely fed up by this stage so killed for 300 per result.

    I’m having a lot of problems with the laptop / spooky pulse combination too… for some reason it doesn’t want to work. In order to get it to function, I have to plug it in / out many times. all this is frustrating the hell out of me.

    I don’t think I’ll get to treat myself tomorrow because I’ve got my first subject… a friend of a friend who is stage 3 breast cancer, with mets to the bone and liver.

  • 10th October 2018 at 12:19 pm
    Permalink

    Had a real problem today getting my spooky pulse to work. Plugged it in and out of the laptop about a dozen times. Then when I did manage to get it to work, (red light blinking) I started the scan and got “initialising” message, then “nothing”.

    Re-started spooky, turned off the generator, messed about, re-started windows… eventually, got it to work, but a scan that should have taken 33 minutes, took an hour. The top 5 results were as follows.

    CODE: SELECT ALL

    1693010,1653350,1670090,1644098.75,1649247.5

    When I ran these, I didn’t really get any “tingling” that I have had before in the tumour area. Maybe a bad scan.

    I then ran the “General Cancer with Carrier” pre-set from John White, and felt like I had some success with that. John, if you read this, please can you help me and write a “carcinoma” sweep for the Spooky Central?

  • 10th October 2018 at 12:20 pm
    Permalink

    Hi Vincent,
    the encouraging thing when I look at it is that you have NO results between: 1604000 and 1607500 (Rife’s BX range).

  • 10th October 2018 at 12:25 pm
    Permalink

    The very nature of the biofeedback scan states that if you ask for 5 top hits, you will get 5 top hits. Even if the those top 5 hits only came back because they were slightly higher in response than the rest and not because they actually resonated with anything.

    When you start to get very random #s in a narrow scan range after having very specific results, this is potentially a sign that one has eliminated all resonate responses in that range.

    Just wanted to clarify that if you ask for 5 results, you will always get 5 results.

    Blessings,

    Jeff

  • 10th October 2018 at 12:26 pm
    Permalink

    I sincerely hope you are right guys, and I certainly hope that Rife / John were right too… but…

    When I have any carbs, I still get a pain in the area of the tumour.

  • 10th October 2018 at 2:10 pm
    Permalink

    Hi Vincent,

    since you have “knocked” BX on the head (for now); perhaps you should look at some of the other nasty ones that are on his list for a day or so?
    See if any of these give an effect.

    I’ve given the Rife ranges where there is a difference between the 1935 & 1936. If there is no difference then perhaps go 1Kz above and below.

    Bacillus X or BX (Cancer Carcinoma) 1,604,000 Hz 1,607,450 Hz [done – for now]
    Bacillus Y or BY (Cancer Sarcoma) 1,529,520 Hz 1,530,000 Hz [close to done as well, due to the scans you have run in this region]

    Tuberculosis (Rod) 369,000 Hz 369,433 Hz [ According to Rife it is CRITICAL to hit rod & virus of TB in the same treatments]
    Tuberculosis (Virus) 769,000 Hz (scan around this)

    Gonnorrhea 233,000 Hz (scan around this)

  • 10th October 2018 at 2:12 pm
    Permalink

    Hi Vincent,

    the Dr’s who used Rife machine, when asked what frequencies they used, quite often said “I just used all of the frequencies”. In the clinic where Rife cured 16 people they were either suffering from cancer or TB.
    There’s no record that I have come across (so far) that says what they used on those patients; so I guess everyone would have got everything.
    The other reason is since Rife made these frequencies, you may as well use them now that you have a device that is capable of applying them in the same way.

    If you can get clean scans from all of the Rife ranges (and there are still quite a few more after these new ones, eg. typhis and few others) then I think you can be pretty confident that Rife has done everything he could for you.
    It would then be time to look into other frequency sets from other people or treatments. Just keeping it realistic.

    btw. Have you had any radiation treatment so far; hopefully not?

  • 10th October 2018 at 7:04 pm
    Permalink

    Jason Elliott wrote:
    Hi Vincent,

    btw. Have you had any radiation treatment so far; hopefully not?

    No, I refused all of the “slash, poison, and burn” conventional treatments

  • 10th October 2018 at 7:05 pm
    Permalink

    Friday 05 February 2016.

    Laid looking at the ceiling running the following… Scan for TB Rod and virus…. got two hits in the region…
    CODE: SELECT ALL

    767976,768958,368944,368896
    Ran killing for 10 minutes each.

    I then ran all of the frequencies from dnafrequencies.com that I have for Candida which are around the 1k mark, so I ran them with an octal harmonic on the JW spooky central.

    As I type this, I am extremely frustrated. Nothing so far has worked. I had a couple of Warburton Crumpets at breakfast this morning (yes carbs, it’s my birthday) and had a bleed afterwards, telling me that my tumour is as bad as ever, any spooky help would be appreciated.

  • 10th October 2018 at 7:12 pm
    Permalink

    Brenda, I’ve been doing the Gerson juicing and coffee enemas most days, have an evening meal with the family, and avoid the carbs.

    According to Char at DNAFrequencies.com colorectal cancer is caused by the following

    JC virus
    BK virus
    Simian virus 40
    Human papillomavirus, especially type 16
    Streptococcus gallolyticus (formerly called Streptococus bovis biotype 1)
    Fusobacterium nucleatum
    other Fusobacterium species

    I have purchased all the sets from her and my next plan is to run them one by one over the next week. I’m just working on how to setup spooky to give me the right octal so that it is in the right range for the plasma. There may be another thread to follow if I can’t figure it out.

  • 10th October 2018 at 7:13 pm
    Permalink

    Hi Vincent,
    keep going. I’m guessing here; but there are probably 5 needles in the frequency haystack to be found. You may have already found one of them with the Gledhill frequency.
    Bright side: They say tumor will swell before it shrinks.
    The approach of sweeping each range, pulse scanning is the most thorough thing that you could do.

    In the meantime, have you investigated possible causative agents? Exposures to chemicals, glues etc? Particular foods? Vaccinations? Family history? Tinned foods etc? You really have to go at it from many angles.
    What did you do a lot of… what were significant events. Are there any emotional triggers from 3-5 years ago?

    Diet:
    You know carbs effect it… so can you make a least – irritating diet for yourself? One of the most useful things appears to be curcumins; how much tumeric can you eat?
    Dig into this carbs thing a bit more.

    Rife’s original frequencies will only work if the virus’ he identified are the causative agents; so that’s why I said to go through each one of his as at least you can tick those possibilities off of the list.
    Same thing with Char’s – research papers come out and speculate the various links to virus’ and they then construct the frequencies.
    There are also other sets available that try other approaches – eg. Cancer Metabolics Sets.

  • 10th October 2018 at 7:14 pm
    Permalink

    Vince, l’m guessing that your evening meal us not organic. Nor high raw. Don’t want to offend but from everything l have read, cancer requires strict adherence to diet. I find this myself with my health condition which is Lyme plus a series of environmental poisonings. With very serious illness it just does not work to add a few good for cancer things while you still eat bad for cancer foods or drink. I know its hard but it has to be the basis of the healing programming.

  • 10th October 2018 at 7:14 pm
    Permalink

    Jason Elliott wrote:
    Hi Vincent,
    keep going. I’m guessing here; but there are probably 5 needles in the frequency haystack to be found. You may have already found one of them with the Gledhill frequency.
    Bright side: They say tumor will swell before it shrinks.
    The approach of sweeping each range, pulse scanning is the most thorough thing that you could do.

    In the meantime, have you investigated possible causative agents? Exposures to chemicals, glues etc? Particular foods? Vaccinations? Family history? Tinned foods etc? You really have to go at it from many angles.
    What did you do a lot of… what were significant events. Are there any emotional triggers from 3-5 years ago?

    Diet:
    You know carbs effect it… so can you make a least – irritating diet for yourself? One of the most useful things appears to be curcumins; how much tumeric can you eat?
    Dig into this carbs thing a bit more.

    Rife’s original frequencies will only work if the virus’ he identified are the causative agents; so that’s why I said to go through each one of his as at least you can tick those possibilities off of the list.
    Same thing with Char’s – research papers come out and speculate the various links to virus’ and they then construct the frequencies.
    There are also other sets available that try other approaches – eg. Cancer Metabolics Sets.

    I’ve got a VERY good idea about causative agents. DOCTOR prescribed antibiotics for my rosacea, 18 months I was on them. There is definitely a connection between cancer and candida overgrowth, I got it right there. My gut bacteria was out of “whack”

  • 10th October 2018 at 7:27 pm
    Permalink

    Vincent Gledhill wrote:
    Friday 05 February 2016.
    I then ran all of the frequencies from dnafrequencies.com that I have for Candida which are around the 1k mark, so I ran them with an octal harmonic on the JW spooky central.
    As I type this, I am extremely frustrated. Nothing so far has worked.

    Hey Vincent, have you tried the candida frequencies that were published at some point by Pulsed Technologies?
    Here is the PDF version I got from this forum a while ago:
    Candida_Research-Holman_Dorneanu_2009.pdf
    (3.29 MiB) Downloaded 64 times

    Let me know if you manage to feel something with these frequencies.

  • 10th October 2018 at 7:35 pm
    Permalink

    Hi Vincent,

    perhaps not what you wrote…but if you could believe the antibiotics caused it; do you have the information on the brands etc; and the chemicals used? It may be useful to read up on that & lead to other ideas on what to do…

  • 10th October 2018 at 7:36 pm
    Permalink

    Florin Sava wrote:
    Hey Vincent, have you tried the candida frequencies that were published at some point by Pulsed Technologies?
    Here is the PDF version I got from this forum a while ago:
    Candida_Research-Holman_Dorneanu_2009.pdf

    Let me know if you manage to feel something with these frequencies.

    No, I haven’t seen that. Thanks. I’ll take a look.

    Jason Elliott wrote:
    perhaps not what you wrote…but if you could believe the antibiotics caused it; do you have the information on the brands etc; and the chemicals used? It may be useful to read up on that & lead to other ideas on what to do…

    Hi Jason. They’re Oxytetracycline 250mg (two x twice a day) for 18 months, and I believe these took out my some of my good bacteria, which led to a compromised immune system.

    Today…. I have done the following.
    Ran the “Gledhill” frequency listed earlier, no effects felt over a 20 minute session.
    Ran the preset JW cancer (with carrier) from the “February 2016” software (this felt like it was working somewhat)
    Then I ran the whole DNAFrequencies.com set for Human papillomavirus, which is a 13 frequency set. Being that I wanted to ensure I knocked them all out, I ran these with a dwell multiplier of 4, which meant 720 seconds per frequency. Decided that was enough for today.

    According to Charlene… these are what is responsible for colorectal cancer… and I have purchased all of the sets. So will run them all… on long dwells one after the other, as time permits.
    JC virus
    BK virus
    Simian virus 40
    Human papillomavirus, especially type 16
    Streptococcus gallolyticus (formerly called Streptococus bovis biotype 1)
    Fusobacterium nucleatum
    other Fusobacterium species

  • 10th October 2018 at 7:38 pm
    Permalink

    Because of Johns post on another thread, today I have been running the preset cancer with carrier, followed by the Simian Virus 40 set from Dnafrequencies.com

  • 10th October 2018 at 7:38 pm
    Permalink

    Last couple of days I’ve been running John’s Cancer with Carrier preset, plus this sweep from another thread by Jason Elliott, Thanks Jason.

    CODE: SELECT ALL

    “BX SWEEP”,CUST,,””,”1604000-1607450=1800″,,,180

  • 10th October 2018 at 8:34 pm
    Permalink

    I am a little disappointed I haven’t had any herx reaction whatsoever. Yes I did get tired when running the plasma tube, and fell asleep at times, a herx would make me think I’ve been hitting the MOR’s. At the moment, I don’t think I have.

    IMO “getting tired” when treating with plasma is indeed a herx reaction. From my experience, this reaction seems to be common with viruses, bacteria, yeasts and possibly mycoplasma (still need more testing here).

    Test it out: find a frequency you get tired on and keep the plasma on. The sensation won’t go away while it’s transmitting. Turn it off and let your liver catch up and you’ll return to normal. Come back in a bit, turn it back on and see if you reaction similarly.

  • 10th October 2018 at 8:37 pm
    Permalink

    Vincent Gledhill wrote:
    CODE: SELECT ALL

    1604973.66
    Guess what’s going to get run first thing tomorrow?

    Interesting number; within the 1935 range; where Hoyland stripped off the last three digits too!
    My guess would have been in the 1605-1606.5 sort of area.

    Curious that you got pretty much the same frequency again with the pulse. Lets see where it goes next!

  • 10th October 2018 at 8:38 pm
    Permalink

    Getting the same number twice, and only that number, was astounding to me. And when I hit it, it felt “right”

    The sensation was more of a “pins and needles” type of feeling, exactly at the area of the tumor. To me, it was saying MOR all day long.

    Oh, and I’ve been running that number all night on remote 😉

    Let’s see what later today brings with the magic wand. 😉

  • 10th October 2018 at 8:41 pm
    Permalink

    For 80+ years no advancements have been made to refine the cancer frequencies discovered by Royal Rife. Well done Vincent. You may be making history!

  • 10th October 2018 at 8:43 pm
    Permalink

    Quick update 25th Jan 2016.

    I ran the above frequencies for half an hour, then did another bio scan between 1603000-1605000 and got the following two frequencies.

    CODE: SELECT ALL

    1603200,1602170

    When I run these JW Spooky Central default, I got feedback from the tumour with the first frequency, but got a tingling in my face, from the rosacea when running the second.

    This really got me thinking that Rife was indeed right, and that cancer is a “pleomorphic” virus form of a fungal form. Simoncini is “partly right” in that cancer “is” the viral form of the fungus. I’m hypothesizing here outloud, but I recon, you get fungal infections, and when your system is overloaded with toxins, and your immune system is suppressed, it can develop into cancer.

    I had rosacea for years, and went to the doctor, and was given antibiotics to clear it up…. which started me on the downward spiral, resulting in my cancer. That coupled with my heavy metal toxicity from my 8 fillings and the route canal… hey presto.

    So… end of “thinking out loud” back to the plot. Once I’d ran those a few times, I broke for lunch…. and instead of my usual Gerson Juice, I decided to have some carbs, to see if I got any “growing pains” from the tumour area. A sandwich, followed by a couple of chocolate biscuits (cookies for you US friends) lovely. Oh, and no objection from the tumour… RESULT

    Another bio scan…. result this time, just one…
    CODE: SELECT ALL

    1602392

    I guess I’m murdering some, and others are altering…. but there’s no escape…. I’m after you…. Image

  • 10th October 2018 at 8:47 pm
    Permalink

    Todays Treatment.
    Scan within the rife range..
    Scan

    I then saved the results and made a sweep 200 Hz each side
    CODE: SELECT ALL

    1644325-1634825,1633675-1634075,1627675-163075,1696675-1697075,1632925-163325

    I then ran the above sweeps at dwell 720 each.

    Once completed, after lunch I ran another scan as above, and hit the results directly for a dwell time of 300
    CODE: SELECT ALL

    1630875,16323751628625,1629750,1567500

    Any input to help me get maximum MOR time would be greatly appreciated, and any help with settings for the SC also, thanks in advance.

  • 10th October 2018 at 8:52 pm
    Permalink

    Hi Vincent,

    I am following your journey with great interest and wishing you a compete recovery. When you run the sweep with SC are you changing any of the SC preset variables? Are you modulating output2 or only adding a 0 instead of say a 12 Hz?

    Mark

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.